
These are some of the requests proposed by the registered users. I consider all of them interesting and I will do my best to include them in the future versions of the VQLog. If you have your own request please send it to VQLog's support (only registered users!)
Click here for requests already implemented
DL1ELY proposals:
DL6ZBN proposals:
DH6JL proposals:
EA3BTD proposals:
EA8AJ proposals:
GM4JJJ proposals:
IT9VDQ proposals:
YO4AUL proposals:
DF2ZC proposals:
PA3BWE proposals:
PE1OUC proposals:
PE1OGF proposals:
SM5WPW proposals:
ES1RF proposals:
G4IGO proposals:
K1UHF proposals:
VK6XLR proposals:
OH5YW proposals:
M0HEN/PC7CW proposals:
PE1LWT proposals:
EI3IO proposals:
DL6LAU proposals:
GU6AJE proposals:
OZ2Q proposals:
G0ISW proposals:
DG3GAG proposals:
PA3HEN proposals:
DL1KDA proposals:
IZ1CCD proposals:
G0ISW proposals:
OZ2M proposals:
VK4CP proposals:
F6ETI proposals:
H44PT / G8BCG proposals:
DG3GAG proposals:
KM5ES proposals:
PA3ECU proposals:
EI3IO proposals:
PA3GST proposals:
M0BKG proposals:
G1IOV proposals:
DK8VR proposals:
GW8IZR proposals:
G0RUZ proposals:
DM3ML proposals:
K0GU proposals:
G0MVP proposals:
HB9CRQ proposals:
PA3FYG proposals:
DK1CM proposals:
M1CNK proposals:
N9LF proposals:
2) Provide a report that shows all QSOs with all stations from needed (unconfirmed DXCC stations to assist with selecting which QSOs to QSL.
3) The option to determine whether electronic QSLs (LoTW, eQSL) are valid for awards needs to be settable on a per-award basis. For example, LoTW is valid for WAS and DXCC, but not for USA-CA (All US Counties).
4) When importing ADIF or other logs, produce a report of imported QSOs, including and indication of which QSOs represent new DXCC band/mode, US States, Grid (Locators), etc.
5) Support VE7CC AR User program for packet cluster spotting via TCP/IP local port (127.0.0.1) port 7300. At a minumum, support AR User via DDE directly (without shim programs).
6) Provide support for creating DXCC submissions. This process should create a QSL card selection check list and prepare printer-ready DXCC forms. The selection checklist should select QSOs for all confirmed entities to assist the user with the selection and sorting of the appropriate cards to be included on the DXCC submission. This will also require that a method of determining which DXCC bands and modes have previously been verified (i.e., submitted to DXCC card checkers).
7) Record the date in a QSO record when a QSL is sent or received.
8) At present, when both a paper QSL card and an electronic QSL is received (or sent), only one is saved in the QSO record. It should be possible to show that both paper and electronic QSLs have been sent/received.
9) Provide a method to allow the rapid entry of QSOs in real time when running stations (for example, running stations during an E-skip opening). This is similar in some ways to contest logging, but without points, multipliers, dupe checking, band map, etc. This might also be useful when manually entering a list of QSOs that were originally logged on paper.
10) When displaying a report on screen, allow the user to select the program used to view the report. Notepad is currently used and that is adequate in most cases, but I want to specify which program to use.
11) When creating a report, include a comma seperated value (CSV) format option. This allows one to easily import the report into Excel for additional sorting and analysis.
12) Provide a mechanism to automatically synchronize the log with Logbook of The World (LoTW). This process should upload QSOs to LoTW and download and apply LoTW QSL confirmations. Downloaded LoTW information should fill in missing QSO information. For example, if the LoTW QSL includes an IOTA reference and the QSO IOTA record is blank, the IOTA reference should be filled in.
Automatic fill will inevitably create the situation where the information for a QSO disagrees with the information in the LoTW QSL. I suggest a user configuration option that allows the user to select from three choices 1) LoTW always supercedes QSO data, 2) QSO data always supercedes LoTW data and 3) Prompt the user in each case.
G4CBW proposals:
G4BVE proposals:
K0KP proposals:
N3UYI proposals:
IK0WGF proposals:
KD5IUG proposals:
K4RLK proposals:
EA5FY proposals:
K4RLK proposals:
SP9SOU proposals:
9H1PI proposals:
K6EID proposals:
PE1AHX proposals:
G4DBX proposals:
M0KCM proposals:
K1DG proposals:
NW7U proposals:
EA5FY proposals:
ES2NA proposals:
KA1A proposals:
KA2LIM proposals:
WA2RZJ proposals:
DG5BD proposals:
GW3ZCF proposals:
SM7FJE proposals:
K0TV proposals:
DB5KN proposals:
N9BC proposals:
SV2BBO proposals:
CT1CBI proposals:
WK3C proposals:
KE4BMT proposals:
IZ2EWV proposals:
OH3HTU proposals:
WK3C proposals:
W5/DK1CM proposals:
S51U proposals:
ON6AA proposals:
9H1EI proposals:
M0ELS proposals:
PA3BZL proposals:
DK8XT proposals:
VE3XK proposals:
DG1CMZ proposals:
PA2WJZ proposals:
NW7U proposals:
M0BPQ proposals:
NA9D proposals:
ZR6D proposals:
VU2MHK proposals:
G8FXM proposals:
WA6TMJ proposals:
SM0TSC proposals:
DH4NWG proposals:
PY1RO proposals:
N1JFU proposals:
G4PEL proposals:
DL8EBW proposals:
MS Logbook: Date Time Call Locator TX RX B P sec status remarks 13.03.2003 1112 ea6vq jm19xx R28 R26 10 12 0,3 complete nice refl.
Fine will be that you be able to sort on all inputs (like sort on call, sort on locator, sort on dates - time periodes... ) and /or be able to show the results on an map (europe) - statistical overview will be not so easy...
He have written a short programm for it - Also some other Logbooks use it! they will have the input routines for LOCATOR or / and Long.+ Lat. - as I said - its very wellcome on expeditions...
W4WB proposals:
VK3KOS proposals:
N9DG proposals:
DJ7KG proposals:
OZ1PIF proposals:
VE3KLM proposals:
DL1EJA proposals:
W9KNI proposals:
OH3MBC proposals:
OH2LFM proposals:
PA5BM proposals:
PG2D proposals:
DG3FK proposals:
VE7YC proposals:
WB4MNK proposals:
DB9UH proposals:
IZ3CGD proposals:
WA6PYQ proposals:
Martin Groth proposals:
HB9PJT proposals:
OZ1O proposals:
G0KTN proposals:
DL2JWN proposals:
HB9WAH proposals:
NP4X proposals:
OE9ADW proposals:
OH7NRW proposals:
IK5QLO proposals:
N8FGX proposals:
G1NIM proposals:
CU3AK proposals:
F4JRC proposals:
K9DUR proposals:
PA3C proposals:
DJ5RE proposals:
SM43XIH proposals:
KC9GGV proposals:
SV8CS proposals:
DF7RG proposals:
SM7GVF proposals:
K2WO proposals:
WA2NXK proposals:
G4ZWY proposals:
F4EKV proposals:
OZ4PH proposals:
AG4AN proposals:
F4BKV proposals:
ZS2EZ proposals:
N9LF proposals:
When I noticed this behavior, I modified the QSO Time in VQlog and ran the update proceedure again. This time, it matched up the records and correctly updated the QSL Received flag.
While this isn\'t really a program bug, it would seem that it needs to be considered for a future version. I am not sure just how close the times should be in order to be recognized as a match, but I checked LoTW and they use 30 minutes.
HB9CRQ proposals:
SM2GCR proposals:
LA3ZA proposals:
G0ISW proposals:
K4NNX proposals:
WD0AKO proposals:
These links below are from the following website
http://www.n3fjp.com/ACLog.htm*
ftp://ftp.fcc.gov/pub/Bureaus/Wireless/Databases/uls/complete/l_amat.zip
**ftp://ftp.rac.ca/pub/cdncaldb.zip
DD0VF proposals:
K8GUN proposals:
CT1FJC proposals:
SQ1K proposals:
ON4BCB proposals:
DG1NFS proposals:
IW1QN proposals:
IW3GOW proposals:
G4RRA proposals:
SM7GVF proposals:
PA2KW proposals:
Click here to go to
VQLog's home-page
Join
VQLog's Mailing List !